by software artist Scott Draves. You may also follow me on google+ or twitter, buy art, or join me on facebook.
|
In recent years, the search for the fundamental laws of nature has forced us to think about the Big Bang much more deeply. According to our best theories — string theory and M theory — all of the details of the laws of physics are actually determined by the structure of the universe; specifically, by the arrangement of tiny, curled-up extra dimensions of space. This is a very beautiful picture: particle physics itself is now just another aspect of cosmology. But if you want to understand why the extra dimensions are arranged as they are, you have to understand the Big Bang because that's where everything came from.Turok rejects the Anthropic principle and questions the "landscape" of possible universes that String Theory predicts. He goes on to give Dark Energy a central role in triggering the next Big Bang, but I am confused about how. On one hand he says "it is the decay of dark energy which leads to the next Big Bang" but "the dark energy itself causes these two membranes to attract".
Previously: Word for the Day: Ekpyrotic.
previously: Beginningless.
Previously: GPUFlame by Simon Green.
Oh and the Ekpyrotic Universe is a alternative cosmology to Inflationary Theory, which has been the consensus since the early 90s when it was discovered to predict the fluctuations in the cosmic background radiation and the large scale structure of the universe. The idea is that quantum fluctuations near the beginning of time inflate and become seeds for galaxies.
The problem is that inflation is just patched on to the standard model of quantum+gravity that runs the world we see here and now. And then in the late 90s dark energy had to be thrown in to cover the accelerating expansion seen by measuring the redshift of supernovas.
So physicists have been searching for models that predict the fluctuations and the accelerated expansion rather than suffering them as patches. The Ekpyrotic Universe has been one such option, based on the idea from String Theory that the Big Bang is the collision between branes in a higher dimensional space. In the Cyclic version of this theory these intersections, and hence universes like ours, recur at trillion year intervals.
But these theories suffered from their own mathematical complications of too many dimensions and singularities. These problems have reportedly been solved in the past couple of months. How can these theories be distinguished? By measuring gravitational waves.
Fascinating. The implications are enourmous.